Un-Wise Decision

email

It takes a lifetime to build a reputation and only one tweet to destroy it. That’s what Washington Post reporter Mike Wise is finding out after an ill-fated social experiment using social media.

Wise thought he was going to pull a clever little ruse. He’d send out a tweet with falsified news – saying he was told Pittsburgh Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger would have his NFL suspension reduced from six games to five – and then watch the media and blogosphere run with the report as if it were fact.

Now, we all get to sit back and see if Wise will have his one-month suspension from the Post reduced.

Wise wanted to shine light on the slippery slope we’re heading down with today’s journalistic standards – where anyone can quote unnamed sources and break a story in 140 characters or less. The problem with that logic is that Wise isn’t just anyone, he’s a respected journalist.  At least he was.

Wise’s Roethlisberger “news” did get picked up by some credible outlets, but they all attributed the report to him and his paper – as in “according to the Washington Post’s Mike Wise – ” – making both look terrible when this unfolded as a hoax.

In my opinion, Wise is very lucky to walk away from this with a relatively minor suspension, although I’m guessing the story hasn’t fully played out yet. After this misstep, I don’t know how any readers can trust his stories and I don’t know how his employer can trust his judgment.


Other posts by

  • http://knoxesque.wordpress.com Nate

    Wise DOES have a point about today’s journalistic standards and the rampant use of unnamed and concealed identity sources.

    More news articles have published with unnamed sources in the past year alone than the entire news industry’s history.*

    However, given his stature and his employer, we as news consumers trust his word without question. A simple tweet has completely damaged his reputation. I’ll certainly factcheck his stories from now on, that’s for sure.

    The worst part of this story, to me, is the number of other news agencies and reporters who picked up the story without doing their own factchecking. Simply citing a tweet as a source is NOT being a reporter.

    *Did you fall for that? It’s total garbage and not factual. Sucker